West Ham’s Summer 2025 Transfer Budget Revealed: Fans in Disbelief
West Ham United’s summer 2025 transfer window has sparked intense debate among fans, with the club’s reported £95 million budget—constrained by Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR)—leaving supporters frustrated and disillusioned. The revelation, coupled with the club’s cautious approach to spending, has reignited calls for majority shareholder David Sullivan to step down, as fans believe his financial strategy is stifling the club’s progress. The sentiment is clear: West Ham’s potential is being squandered under an owner perceived to lack ambition.
The £95 million budget, while substantial in isolation, is seen as inadequate for a club aiming to climb the Premier League table after a disappointing 14th-place finish in the 2024-25 season. Fans point to recent posts on X, where users like
@ibbywhu
have lambasted Sullivan’s claim that the club must sell players to fund new signings, calling it “complete nonsense” given the club’s healthy financial position. With hundreds of thousands shaved off the wage bill after releasing players, supporters argue there’s room for bolder investment. The club’s record turnover in recent years only fuels their frustration, as they question why more isn’t being reinvested into the squad.
David Sullivan, alongside co-owner Daniel Kretinsky, has faced mounting criticism for their handling of the transfer market. Reports indicate West Ham are at their PSR limit, necessitating player sales to fund manager Graham Potter’s rebuild. This has led to speculation about key players like Mohammed Kudus, with Chelsea and Aston Villa circling, though a recent swap deal offer for Kudus was rejected. Fans fear losing star players without adequate replacements, a concern echoed in reports from West Ham Zone, which emphasized the need for strategic planning to avoid regression.
The fanbase’s discontent is palpable, with an online petition launched in May 2025 calling for Sullivan and vice-chair Karren Brady’s removal, garnering over 3,000 signatures. Supporters feel Sullivan’s hands-on approach to transfers—acting as de facto director of football—undermines Potter’s vision. X posts, such as one from
@WestHam_Central
, accuse Sullivan of lacking ambition, claiming the PSR narrative is a convenient excuse to avoid spending. Fans point to the club’s net spend of just £60 million over the past two summer windows, a figure dwarfed by rivals, as evidence of mismanagement.
Despite the financial constraints, there’s cautious optimism about potential signings. West Ham have been linked with Rangers’ striker Hamza Igamane and Borussia Dortmund’s Carney Chukwuemeka, signaling Potter’s intent to reshape the squad. However, fans remain skeptical, with many believing Sullivan’s reluctance to splash cash will see West Ham miss out on top targets. The prospect of Ange Postecoglou replacing Potter has also surfaced, with fans like Daniel Hurley (
@DHurleybooks
) expressing enthusiasm for the former Spurs boss, though doubts persist about Sullivan’s willingness to appoint such an outspoken figure.
As West Ham face a pivotal summer, the disconnect between the board and the fanbase grows. Supporters dream of a club that matches their ambition, but Sullivan’s conservative approach has left them grieving for progress. The call for “Sullivan out” grows louder, as fans demand an owner who shares their vision for a brighter future at the London Stadium.
Sources:,,,,,,,
