The Rangers vs Athletic Bilbao match was marked by controversy when a potential penalty claim was denied due to a complex VAR decision. The incident occurred when Cyriel Dessers’ shirt was ripped open by Dani Vivian in the box, with Dessers visibly distressed. Despite this, the referee awarded a yellow card to Dessers instead of a penalty.
The VAR system reviewed the footage, but ultimately decided not to overturn the referee’s decision. This sparked outrage among Rangers players and fans, who felt that a penalty was warranted. The decision-making process was criticized, with many questioning why VAR didn’t intervene.
Rangers disputed the VAR decision, arguing that a penalty should have been awarded due to the clear foul in the box. The club maintained that Vivian’s actions constituted a clear penalty, and that VAR’s failure to intervene was a mistake. Rangers’ frustration was palpable, with many fans and pundits questioning the VAR system’s accuracy.
The VAR decision in the Rangers vs Athletic Bilbao match highlights the challenges of using technology in football. While VAR aims to improve accuracy, it can also introduce controversy and debate. In this case, the decision not to award a penalty was based on the referee’s initial judgment, which VAR didn’t overturn.
*Given the specifics of the incident, I believe it was a penalty*. The contact between Vivian and Dessers in the box was clear, and VAR should have intervened to correct the error. The VAR system’s purpose is to ensure accuracy and fairness, and in this case, it fell short. The incident has sparked debate, with many arguing that VAR’s role is to correct clear and obvious errors, and that this decision was indeed an error.
The Rangers penalty incident vs Athletic Bilbao serves as a reminder of VAR’s impact on football. While the system has its limitations, it also provides opportunities for improvement. As the technology continues to develop, it’s essential to refine its application and ensure consistency in decision-making. By doing so, football can reduce controversy and promote fairness, ultimately enhancing the sport for fans and players alike. The debate surrounding VAR will persist, but with ongoing refinement, it can become a valuable tool in promoting accurate and fair outcomes.
